Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mel Hamilton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mel Hamilton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A case of WP:BIO1E. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Wyoming. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Christianity, and Latter Day Saints. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG. Has coverage many years later. [1] [2][3][4][5][6] ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WikiOriginal, but article does need a fair bit of work. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep subject looks notable and has enough news coverage as indicated above.Mysecretgarden (talk) 08:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion by WikiOriginal that together shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per WikiOriginal-9's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mel Hamilton

zproxy.org